Re: [PIUG List] Changes in PCT published applications / Question on US CIP

From: William Meredith <william.meredith_at_wipo.int>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:56:44 +0100

The information is also coded in machine-readable format in the XML data
that we make available to commercial providers. Anyone wanting help
with the technical details is welcome to contact us directly at
patentscope_at_wipo.int.

Your other suggestions regarding kind codes are also interesting since
we are planning to revise (hopefully improve) our use of kind codes in
the next 12 months.

Regards
William


Stephen Adams a écrit :
> Dear William,
> You wrote,
>
>> There is a text on the front page of the main publication document
>> which says "- with sequence listing part of the description published
>> separately...". Note that the text is in the publication language and
>> there are 8 official publication languages.
>>
> To which my response is - Oh, dear. I don't suppose there is any
> chance of putting this text at a consistent point on the front page,
> or better still, including it under an existing INID code? Without
> some form of consistent, preferably machine-readable, statement, I can
> imagine a simple plain-text annotation being easily overlooked,
> especially for monoglot document suppliers when it can be in 8 language=
s.
>
> There is precedent in the use of INID 83 to supply a cross-reference
> to a micro-organism deposit, which it could be argued is another form
> of "document annex". It appears that INID 69 is also currently
> vacant. Will WIPO consider the impact of this new policy before
> implementing, and whether the indication of document status can be
> better regulated?
> As an off-the-cuff suggestion, it might even be worth considering a
> new Kind-of-Document code - maybe WO-A4 for "specification plus search
> report without genetic sequence listing" to be analoguous to WO-A1 and
> new WO-A5 for "specification without genetic sequence listing or
> search report", analoguous to WO-A2. You could still use A1 and A2 as
> before, for cases outside the biotech area, and the new codes would
> serve to alert users unambiguously that this is a partial document.
> Thanks
> Stephen
>

-------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PIUG List owner: Patent Information Users' Group Inc. (R), http://
www.piug.org
PIUG List rules and guidelines: http://www.piug.org/list.php
PIUG List admin: piug_discussion_list-owner(at)v2(dot)listbox(dot)com
PIUG Discussion List @ Listbox
13&id_secret=92726568-db80e2
d_secret=85436559-c8af76

Received on Sun Feb 03 2008 - 12:09:57

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 06 2009 - 07:03:13