As everyone on this list knows, U.S. application numbers consist of a serie=
s number and a serial number in the format SS/NNNNNN where SS is the series=
and NNNNNN is the serial number. In formatting this as a priority number =
Espacenet discards the SS and replaces it with the application year. So go=
ing from an Espacenet application number or priority number to the USPTO nu=
mber forces the user to look up the series dates.
Am I correct in understanding that the U.S. series numbers advance when and=
only when NNNNNN reaches 1 million? In other words, the SS-slash is simpl=
y and antiquated column place holder and no information content would be lo=
st by writing U.S. application numbers as 8-digit serial numbers.
Alan Engel
Paterra, Inc.
2-1-6 Sengen, Tsukuba
Ibaraki 305-0047 Japan
Email: aengel_at_paterra.com
-------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
PIUG ® -- Celebrating Our 20th Anniversary
PIUG Discussion List @ Listbox
List owner: Patent Information Users' Group Inc., http://www.piug.org
List rules and guidelines: http://www.piug.org/list.php
List admins: piug_discussion_list-owner(at)v2(dot)listbox(dot)com
3&id_secret=101952990-a5e9bf
_secret=101483107-69b265
Received on Mon Apr 21 2008 - 06:03:13
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Nov 20 2008 - 07:03:15