Patent Translations, Language Wars, and the EU Patent
How hard is it to agree on a single European patent that grants IP protection across Europe? Very, very hard. For decades, companies doing business in Europe have pushed Eurocrats to replace a system of national patents requiring costly translations into multiple languages with a single European patent. But national interests and national pride–in particular, language pride–has stood in the way.
When the London Agreement concluded in 2000, most EU states grudgingly accepted that only patent claims would be translated into each of their native languages. Further progress came last year, when Europe signed off on an EU patent that would require patent claims to be translated into English, German, and French only–the most commonly spoken EU languages and the working languages of the European Patent Office (EPO) since 1997. Beyond translating the claims into the other two official languages, patents written in English, German, or French would require no further translation to grant patent protection across the EU. But Spain and Italy–powerful EU states with widely spoken languages–have strongly objected. They say the proposal gives British, German, and French companies an unfair advantage, and insist that any European patent include Spanish and Italian as one of the official languages, or else that English only should be the official language. All the EU states minus Spain and Italy supported the new EU patent, but without unanimous consent the proposal could not move forward.
Then last week the Council of the European Union voted to proceed under the enhanced cooperation procedure, which allows EU member states to adopt new rules where unanimous agreement cannot be reached, essentially overruling Spain and Italy’s veto power.
Will this new push finally break the political deadlock? It’s too soon to tell. Spain and Italy have threatened to mount a court challenge, arguing that forcing Spanish and Italian companies to litigate patents in another language violates their right to defense. In the meantime, companies seeking patent protection in Europe will still need to translate claims or the full spec to obtain protection in most member states, and decide if that protection merits the costs associated with translation and validation. Increasingly, American companies are forgoing protection in most of Europe due to the high costs, and focusing only those states where no further translations are required after grant. This group includes France, Great Britain, Germany, and Switzerland, but does not include many of Europe’s biggest economies, including Spain and Italy, where the full spec needs to be translated.
Healthcare Patents and Artificial Intelligence
Patent Process Services
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is dramatically transforming healthcare practices like disease diagnosis, treatment recommendations, risk prediction, health monitoring through wearable devices, drug discovery, and even robotic surgery. In this webinar, we will explore patent issues that arise when AI is used in healthcare, discuss inventorship where AI facilitates (or conceives) the claimed subject matter, provide patent… Read More »Healthcare Patents and Artificial Intelligence
The New European Patenting Landscape – Today’s best practices for obtaining European patent
Patent Process Services
Find out how filing options in Europe are changing with a focus on topics such as: Understanding your options; the current ones and those to come How much will the Unitary Patent affect the validation process? Is it just about cost efficiency? Why opt out from the Unified Patent Court? What we hear industry leaders… Read More »The New European Patenting Landscape – Today’s best practices for obtaining European patent
NFTs and trademarks, the metaverse and your IP
Blockchain and NFTs have many potential implications for IP rights. Here, we summarize the main IP risks and opportunities for owners of NFTs and trademarks.