
- Patent
- Our Patent solutions
- IP Intelligence SoftwareStreamline the journey from innovation to IP with our IP intelligence software, patent search, data analytics, and related services and tools.→ Read moreOur solutionsPowerful patent searching and analysisArtificial intelligence for patent classificationGrant statistics and detailed legal status analysisSmall molecules searching and analysisDNA and amino acid searching and analysisExplore new markets and opportunitiesEasy patent searching and collaborationAnalysis from any scientific sourcesUnlock AI-powered use cases across a range of Questel software.SEP DatabaseNEWStandard Essential Patent Data & AnalyticsLatest resources
- → How to Do a Prior Art Search for Standard Essential PatentsTo search prior art for SEPs effectively, patent searchers need to think beyond trad...
- → Demystifying Patent Invalidity Searching: A Comprehensive Guide with Orbit IntelligencePatent invalidation searches probe into the foundations of a granted patent's validi...
- → Patent Search Techniques: Five High-Level Steps in Search Strategy BuildingAn effective search strategy requires searchers to master a specific set of patent s...
- → How to Do a Prior Art Search for Standard Essential Patents
- IP Management SoftwareKeep your assets up to date and aligned with your corporate strategy with our Equinox suite of IP management software, data analytics, and eBilling tools→ Read moreOur solutionsPowerful all-in-one IPMS for corporatesIPMS tailored for large corporates, built on SalesforcePowerful all-in-one IPMS for law firmsIPMS tailored for large Law FirmsCollaborative invention-to-filing workflowLatest resources
- → Can Software Simplify IP Management for Law Firms?Innovation is at the heart of the IP industry. But, as a busy law firm, how much tim...
- → Intellectual Property Management: How to Maximize Performance in the Digital AgeFrom deadline reminders to project collaboration, data verification, and the automat...
- → Finally, an IPMS that ushers IP departments into modernity!Discover the power of customization and six tips for modernizing IP management share...
- → Can Software Simplify IP Management for Law Firms?
- Preparation & Prosecution CopilotsOptimize your entire patent process with our range of advanced Preparation & Prosecution Copilots, from patent application drafting to prosecution workflow automation, claims mapping, and office action responses.→ Read moreOur solutionsAll-in-one patent prosecution workflow, data, and collaboration workspace.AI-DraftingNEWIndustry-leading patent drafting software powered by generative AI.Patent Mapping and Claim Analysis with AIPatent Office Action Response Management with AILeverage the power of data to guide your patent prosecution with Prosecution PackLatest resources
- → How AI is Transforming IP Management for GoodDiscover the holistic and responsible approach to AI that is central to Questel's st...
- → AI in IP – Generative AI, Beyond a Technological ChangeUnlock the potential of AI with insights from industry experts Benoit Chevalier, Mar...
- → Leverage Artificial Intelligence to Simplify Your Prosecution WorkUnlock exclusive insights and discover how Qthena, the AI-powered prosecution assist...
- → How AI is Transforming IP Management for Good
- Patent ServicesBenefit from end-to-end support for vital but time-consuming administrative tasks with our complete range of patent support services, including searches, translations, international filings, validations, unitary patent management, recordals, renewals, and more→ Read moreOur solutionsPatentability, Freedom-To-Operate, InvalidityPCT & national phase, Paris Convention, Unitary PatentUnitary Patent and Unified Patent Court servicesSimplified European validation servicesCentralized patent translation servicesFee and renewals managementAssignment and recordal of all IP RightsLatest resources
- → [WHITE PAPER] IP RIGHTS in mergers and acquisitionsIP RIGHTS in mergers and acquisitions Download the white paper ...
- → State of the art analysis a click away!In our rapidly changing world, only R&D teams able to mobilize and manage large volu...
- → Benchmarking – Defend your market and tackle your competitorsAssess and evaluate your position in your markets by comparing with your competitors...
- → [WHITE PAPER] IP RIGHTS in mergers and acquisitions
- Patent Strategy & Administration→ Read more
Control costs, streamline invoices, and safeguard your patent rights efficiently with our patent strategy & administration services and tools
Our solutionsEnd-to-end IP admin, data verification and docketingInvoice review, bundling and paymentFee audits, negotiation, compliance, benchmarks and forecastingLandscaping, benchmarking, valuation and licensingDefensive PublicationBUY ONLINEPublish an invention into the public domainLatest resources- → [WHITE PAPER] Three stages to any IP StrategyThree stages to any IP Strategy Download the white paper Questel Intelle...
- → Checklist for protecting and enforcing your intellectual property rightsAs business becomes more complex and global, the number and variety of intellectual ...
- → 8 Best practices for an efficient annual legal department budgetYear after year, every in-house legal department knows that preparing the usual annu...
- → [WHITE PAPER] Three stages to any IP Strategy
- TrademarkNew
- Our Trademark solutions
- Clearance & Watch PlatformScreen and monitor your brand and trademark rights effectively with our trademark clearance search and trademark monitoring platform→ Read moreOur solutionsScreen trademarks with AI-driven search technologyMarkify Comprehensive SearchBUY ONLINEAI-driven trademark availability softwareBest-in-class trademark results paired with key pharmaceutical sourcesWatch for new, identical and confusingly similar trademarksMonitor marketplaces, social media, and web contentLatest resources
- → The 3 elements to consider when doing a trademark searchOf course, you do! But you might not be aware of the fact that there are thousands o...
- → Cut Costs When Conducting Your Crucial Trademark SearchA trademark search is a necessary and essential part of owning and registering a new...
- → Picture this: Fast and Affordable Trademark Device SearchesThanks to global connectivity, brands can reach almost anyone, and images can be rec...
- → The 3 elements to consider when doing a trademark search
- IP Management SoftwareManage and maintain your trademark, design and domain name rights effectively with our state-of-the-art trademark management software→ Read moreOur solutionsPowerful all-in-one IPMS for corporatesIPMS tailored for large corporates, built on SalesforcePowerful all-in-one IPMS for law firmsIPMS tailored for large law firmsCollaborative worklfow for trademark and design proposalsLatest resources
- → Record, timestamp and manage your intangible assets using the blockchainHaving the ability to demonstrate that your data existed on a particular date and ti...
- → Gain efficiency, manage your entire IP lifecycle activities on a single integrated platform!By combining IP Management Software with data and services, Questel allows you to se...
- → How can Blockchain & Workflow Monitoring Technologies help Trademark teamsDiscover how to meet the needs of today’s globally connected brands!Trademark depart...
- → Record, timestamp and manage your intangible assets using the blockchain
- AI Assistants for Trademark ProductivityReview trademark search and watch results, create first drafts of goods and services descriptions, classify evidence of use, and manage office action responses effectively with our AI assistants for trademark productivity.→ Read moreOur solutionsAll-in-one digital trademark workflow automationChat with trademark search or watch results to review findings and assess riskSave time and build consistency and compliance with our AI solutionAnalyze content and draft answers with AIManage trademark evidence of use with AILatest resources
- → Future Proof Your IP Management: Smarter Data, Seamless Services & AI-Powered EfficiencyManaging intellectual property shouldn't be a maze of disconnected tools, incomplete...
- → Why, When, and How to Establish Proof of Trademark Use—and Is It Mandatory?Depending on the jurisdiction, brand owners may need to provide trademark proof of u...
- → Artificial Intelligence and IP: What’s on the Horizon for AI and Trademarks? Discover what’s on the horizon for artificial intelligence and IP, including powerfu...
- → Future Proof Your IP Management: Smarter Data, Seamless Services & AI-Powered Efficiency
- Trademark, Design & Domain Services→ Read more
Access expert support throughout the complete brand lifecycle with our integrated domain name, design, and trademark solutions
Our solutionsAnalyst-driven searches with on-demand and customizable reportingIP asset monitoring with intelligent pre-selectionCase management and take-down servicesInternational registration process supportTrademark and design renewal servicesEffective management of corporate domain namesAssignment and recordal of all IP rightsEnd-to-end IP admin, data verification, docketingLatest resources- → How to Register a Trademark: What to Do and What Not to Do When Getting StartedWhen you have a new brand, product, or even an existing business, it’s of the utmost...
- → Accenture and Brandstock: Working CollaborativelyKristen Poggensee of Accenture discusses the benefits of working with IP management ...
- → How Brandstock Helped BACARDI Successfully Register Its EU TrademarkHow Brandstock Helped BACARDI Successfully Register Its EU Trademark As leading prof...
- → How to Register a Trademark: What to Do and What Not to Do When Getting Started
- Innovation
- Our Innovation solutions
- Innovation Management SoftwareMake your innovation management processes faster, efficient and scalable with our end-to-end suite of innosabi innovation management software.→ Read moreOur solutionsBusiness-oriented dashboards for innovatorsStartup deal flow and program managementCollaborative idea and innovation managementCustomers co-creation and communitiesPartners co-innovation and open callsInnovation Project ManagementUnlock AI-powered use cases across a range of Questel software.Latest resources
- → Gain competitive advantage developing innovation networksTo stay innovative when developing new products and processes in a fast paced enviro...
- → Evaluate technology potentialR & D directors face a set of investment opportunities in different technology devel...
- → Why is it so hard to build and maintain the capacity to innovate?This white paper contains 15 pages of management trends, use cases & solutions for i...
- → Gain competitive advantage developing innovation networks
- Innovation ServicesSuccessful innovation processes and culture are about more than the right software tools. Our innovation services leverage proven methods and approaches to generate insights, ideas, and solutions.→ Read moreOur solutionsMarket screening, Competitive intelligence and Technology scoutingConnect with partners, improve or localize your innovation processProducts and services namingSeamless user experience to a global audienceEngage with new audience globallyLatest resources
- → Why is it so hard to build and maintain the capacity to innovate?This white paper contains 15 pages of management trends, use cases & solutions for i...
- → How to build an effective technology scouting frameworkEvery day, 1,000 scientific articles are published, 8,000 patents are filed, and ove...
- → The Best Practices for leading an Open OrganizationThis White paper has been created based on the participation of more than 120 R&D an...
- → Why is it so hard to build and maintain the capacity to innovate?
- SolutionsAI
- Solutions
- Artificial Intelligence in IP→ Read more
Discover Questel’s holistic and responsible approach to artificial intelligence
and intellectual property and our vision to inspire the future of IP with AIOur solutionsDiscover how AI is transforming IPIndustry-leading patent drafting software powered by generative AIAI copilots for optimized patent preparation and prosecution workflowsAI copilot for automated patent classificationAI copilot for elevated trademark clearance searchUnlock AI-powered use cases across a range of Questel software.Proof of UseNewCapture Trademark Evidence of Use with AILatest resources- → From AI to Integrated Services: The IP Trends Revealed by Our 2024 IP Outlook Research As part of our 2024 IP Outlook Research, we set out to measure the impact of emergin...
- → AI and IP: How to Integrate AI into Patent Portfolio Management AI-based technologies are increasingly revolutionizing how we manage, maintain, and ...
- → Leverage Artificial Intelligence to Simplify Your Prosecution WorkUnlock exclusive insights and discover how Qthena, the AI-powered prosecution assist...
- → From AI to Integrated Services: The IP Trends Revealed by Our 2024 IP Outlook Research
- Integrated IP Ecosystem→ Read more
Optimize your intellectual property assets with our comprehensive IP portfolio management solutions,
ensuring maximum protection and strategic advantage for your business.Our solutionsIP management systems, docketing, forecasting, data analytics, blockchain, and eBilling toolsOur web-based platform for IP services managementPAVIS Connect, our solution for companies and laws firms that already have an IP management systemAccess trademark watches directly from Equinox with Markify Watch integrationLatest resources- → How to Develop a Robust Trademark Search and Watching ProgramFrom choosing a trademark to registration and enforcement, the trademark lifecycle c...
- → The Power of IPMS Technology for IP Lifecycle Management By choosing an end-to-end integrated IP management system (IPMS), you can build effi...
- → When Is the Right Time to Upgrade Your IP Management Software?When you are overloaded by IP administrative tasks and deadlines, switching to a new...
- → How to Develop a Robust Trademark Search and Watching Program
- Solutions for Law FirmsStreamline internal processes, satisfy client demand, and remain competitive with our specialist solutions for law firms→ Read moreOur solutionsAll-in-one patent prosecution workflow, data, and collaboration workspace.Patent Office Action Response Management with AIIndustry-leading patent drafting software powered by generative AIPowerful all-in-one IPMS for law firmsPowerful patent searching and analysisScreen and monitor your trademark rights effectively with our Markify platformStreamline multilingual matters with fast and reliable legal translation servicesCentralized patent translation servicesFee and renewals managementTrademark and design renewal servicesLatest resources
- → Leverage Artificial Intelligence to Simplify Your Prosecution WorkUnlock exclusive insights and discover how Qthena, the AI-powered prosecution assist...
- → Can Your IPMS Help Build Strong Client Relationships?Cultivating strong client relationships is incredibly important for IP law firms. Yo...
- → How Equinox Law Firm Supports Redchip Lawyers to Save Time and Build RelationshipsFor law firms with large, multi-disciplinary practices, an IP management system (IPM...
- → Leverage Artificial Intelligence to Simplify Your Prosecution Work
- Solutions for Life Sciences→ Read more
Intellectual property management tools, services, and insights to support life sciences innovation strategies
Our solutionsDNA and amino acid searching and analysisSmall molecules searching and analysisExplore new markets and opportunitiesBest-in-class trademark results paired with key pharmaceutical sourcesPowerful all-in-one IPMS for corporatesTranslation solutions across the product lifecycle—from patent to post-marketCentralized patent translation servicesFee and renewals managementTrademark and design renewal servicesLSPN North America Awards recognize QuestelLatest resources- → The Technology Landscape of Precision Medicine: An IP AnalysisTechnological developments in gene sequencing, imagery, and data analysis are enabli...
- → Harnessing the Power of Patent AnalyticsPatent analytics can reveal new application areas, diversification opportunities, an...
- → Patent Data Analytics, It’s Not Just for Patent SearchingThere are many reasons why organizations may conduct patent searching exercises and—...
- → The Technology Landscape of Precision Medicine: An IP Analysis
- Solutions for R&D and Innovation→ Read more
Strengthen, structure, and maximize your R&D and innovation strategy, workflows, and internal processes by harnessing the latest tools and technologies, including through smart application of generative AI.
Our solutionsCreate more efficient and scalable innovation management processesCollaborative invention-to-filing workflowCollaborative worklfow for trademark and design proposalsMarket screening, competitive intelligence, and technology scoutingStreamline your research and development workflows with AILatest resources- → 6G technology: Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface patents and the next generation of mobile networks By enabling use of 6G technology, innovation in Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces ...
- → Handling a Brand Project Made Simple, Thanks to Equinox Brand ProposalDiscover how Equinox Brand Proposal can help you to manage your Design & Trademark p...
- → AI Patents: What Patent Mapping Can Tell Us About Future AI Technologies Artificial intelligence (AI) is evolving all the time thanks to the growing quantiti...
- → 6G technology: Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface patents and the next generation of mobile networks
- Language Solutions→ Read more
Translation, interpretation and tech-enabled localization services and language solutions that help global organizations open up new markets, overcome regulatory hurdles and connect with audiences worldwide.
Our solutionsStreamline multilingual matters with fast and reliable legal translation servicesTranslation solutions across the product lifecycle—from patent to post-marketManage operations, ensure compliance, and maintain consistent messaging worldwideLatest resources- → Best practices for medical device labeling translationsThe heavily regulated medical device industry often requires translating necessary d...
- → Translation: a key component of FCPA compliance white paperIn response to millions of illegal payments made out by U.S. corporations to obtain ...
- → The Ultimate Guide to Selecting a Dependable Translation Partner for Technical DocumentationWhen it comes to technical documentation, choosing the right translation partner can...
- → Best practices for medical device labeling translations
- Contact
- Learn & Support
- Learn and support
- Webinars & EventsAre you interested in attending one of our online or onsite event?
- Product TrainingsCustomer success is our priority. Increase your skills in the use of Questel’s software
- Product NewsA platform dedicated to software and platforms news and evolutions
- Best-in-class Customer ExperienceOur goal is to exceed our clients' expectations and share best practices
- IP TrainingIncrease the IP-IQ of your entire organization with engaging IP training programs
- Newsletter subscriptionSign up for our quarterly patent and trademark newsletters and set your email preferences below.
- Webinars & Events
- Resource HubStay up-to-date with industry best practices with our latest blogs
- Resource Hub
- About Questel
- Learn & Support
- Learn and support
- Webinars & EventsAre you interested in attending one of our online or onsite event?
- Product TrainingsCustomer success is our priority. Increase your skills in the use of Questel’s software
- Product NewsA platform dedicated to software and platforms news and evolutions
- Best-in-class Customer ExperienceOur goal is to exceed our clients' expectations and share best practices
- IP TrainingIncrease the IP-IQ of your entire organization with engaging IP training programs
- Newsletter subscriptionSign up for our quarterly patent and trademark newsletters and set your email preferences below.
- Webinars & Events
- Resource HubStay up-to-date with industry best practices with our latest blogs
- Resource Hub
- About Questel

A Guide to Federal Rule of Evidence 902: How to Avoid Litigation Collection Minefields
Original doeLEGAL Source - 2020, By Adam Bowers, JD.
Revised April 25, 2023
Pronounced changes to the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) have occurred over the past years. Some are broader in scope, while others create more dramatic effects on the eDiscovery process. The amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 902 has caused many corporate entities to question whether they should continue to allow self-collections of their own litigation data or if they will avoid risks and exposure by hiring a 3rd-party professional service provider to oversee the collection tasks.
The favorable news for US-based corporations is that the amended Federal Rule of Evidence 902 does not require forensic collection experts. Still, there remain some critical reasons to consider seeking the expertise of an outside legal collections expert to ensure proper procedures are in place and followed.
Introduction to the Amended Federal Rule of Evidence 902
Attorneys must understand and optimally participate in identifying, preserving, and collecting their clients' ESI (Electronically Stored Information). Today, courts are more tech-savvy and less forgiving of any ignorance regarding eDiscovery collection practices. This paper provides an overview of self-collection and a cost-benefit analysis of the DIY (do it yourself) model from a lawyer's perspective, not a marketing perspective. An important distinction is drawn here because doeLEGAL and Questel are not forensic collection companies; we offer best-of-breed data collection techniques and practices, using advanced technologies and partners to ensure clients can make effective decisions. The intent is to take an honest look at the issues surrounding how corporate clients gather and identify ESI data to present strong evidence during litigation.
NOTE: This blog is not to be considered legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult with a state-licensed attorney. With that said, let's look at the changes Federal Rule of Evidence 902 brought to life and its impact on eDiscovery collections.
Dangers of allowing employees to conduct legal holds, manage their own data, and administer a self-collection
With eDiscovery technology evolving rapidly, companies often get mired in the weeds, forgetting that humans remain a considerable part of the litigation equation. One past case exemplified the significant expense of allowing employees to preserve their own litigation data: GN Netcom, Inc. v. Plantronics, Inc. The case has become so recognizable in eDiscovery circles, much like Zubulake, that it joins the infamous "single name club" – it's now known as "Plantronics." In this case, a senior member of management instructed his sales team to delete certain emails and other data in direct contradiction to a company-instituted legal hold on those email accounts. The intent of the sales manager was seen as malicious, and the Delaware Federal Judge was not amused. The court sanctioned Plantronics in the amount of three million USD, plus associated fees and costs. While Plantronics proved to be victorious on the merits of the case, it was still liable for the millions in spoliation-associated costs: "They lost the battle but won the war." While the Plantronics case serves as an example of intentional destruction of litigation data, there are also less nefarious reasons that employees should not be left to manage their own data preservations or collections.
Another notable case demonstrated why the process of a client collecting their own documents for litigation, commonly known as "self-collection," is risky and generally frowned upon by courts unless specific circumstances warrant it. Self-collection can potentially jeopardize the client's best interests and the integrity of the case. In fact, one judge expressed deep concerns regarding this practice, as evidenced in EEOC v. M1 5100 Corp., d/b/a Jumbo Supermarket, Inc., Civil No. 19-cv-81320 (S.D. Fla. July 2, 2020).
When clients collect their own ESI for litigation, they may not completely understand the legal and ethical responsibilities involved. This can lead to issues such as over-collection or under-collection due to concerns about self-incrimination or conflicts of interest. Attorneys should instruct their clients to avoid self-collection practices since they must certify a client's self-collection and production efforts (as required by FRCP 26(g)). While self-collection is not inherently flawed, self-selection often poses significant risks in the legal process.
What is self-collection?
Before we get too far into the concepts of preservation and collection, let's define "custodian self-collection" using the two methods used most often. One is where the custodians are responsible for preserving, searching, and identifying their data while IT would do the actual collection (gathering of ESI). The second is where the custodians are responsible for preserving, searching, identifying, and collecting their own data. Each method has many of the same challenges and risks, but the first method is more common in business, so we will use that as our reference.
In a past webcast, 62% of the attendees were concerned with spoliation risks associated with custodian self-preservation. However, in a survey of corporate counsel, 47% of organizations relied on custodian self-preservation more than 75% of the time. A clear split exists between what they know is right and doing what's right. Another thing to keep in mind when exploring how not to over-collect comes from employing a "collect everything" approach to preservation, a practice that creates its own apparent issues, such as increased costs, larger volumes of data to review, and potential risk in other legal matters.

An additional example of the dangers of custodian self-collection comes from Nat’l Day Laborer Org. v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency, government employees from several different agencies attempted to compile data in connection with a FOIA (Federal Rules of Evidence Freedom of Information Act) request. There was a general lack of supervision, and the employees were Federal Rules of Evidence to search their own email accounts. But several ex-employees never had their emails searched at all, which prompted Judge Scheindlin to order the parties to meet again and confer to formulate search criteria and procedures. Scheindlin pointed out that there was no clear identification process in place, and the employees were directed to identify personally created data, which was not a normal work duty. One of the major issues was that those government employees were not even aware of where their custodial data was stored, so when they merely searched their shared drives, many records were entirely overlooked.
Despite spending thousands of hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars on the exercise, the court opined that "Transparency is indeed expensive, but it pales in comparison to the costs to a democracy of operating behind a veil of secrecy". The courts have long disfavored custodian self-collection because it is not systematic, repeatable, and defensible. Judge Scheindlin went so far as to say, "Most custodians cannot be 'trusted' to run effective searches[…]" This may explain why Federal Rule of Evidence 902 was amended to require the certification of a collection by a "qualified person." Attorneys should be involved in all aspects of the preservation and collection of their clients' litigation-data, no matter who performs the physical collection. But the new Federal Rule of Evidence 902 does not directly speak to attorney involvement.
It is notable that the Chancery Court of Delaware had all but placed an outright ban on unsupervised self-collection of employee data. In Roffe v. Eagle Rock Energy GP, LP, et al, CA No. 5258-VCL (Del. Ch. April 8, 2010), the Court of Chancery addressed party self-selection of the documents to be produced in litigation. “This is not satisfactory. Attorneys should not rely on their clients to search their own email systems. There needs to be a lawyer who makes sure the collection is done properly.”
Where, oh where, has my data gone?

The over-collection of litigation data is often the norm, and we explored some of the dangers you face in doing so already. Collecting enough is not the same as over-collecting. Steve Bunting, CEO of Bunting Digital Forensics, said, “You never know when a spoliation claim will come up, and getting everything up front puts you in a far better position down the road.” By creating a forensic image of a device or server, you may just be capturing data that you did not know you would need later. For instance, imaging a laptop will save the entire hard drive, including something called "Federal Rules of Evidence space". Without getting too technical, Federal Rules of Evidence space is the part of a drive that contains deleted items or file fragments. When someone deletes a file, devices will break it into several pieces and send it to the hard drive's Federal Rules of Evidence space. A skilled forensic expert may be able to retrieve and reconstruct ESI from this Federal Rules of Evidence space, which could be important if opposing counsel is accusing your client of intentional or negligent spoliation.
So what's the bottom line here when it comes to self-collection problems? It's really quite simple: most employees don't understand what to collect or from where to collect it. This is where a forensic collections expert can help unravel this problem by creating a "data map" that shows all custodial devices (office, mobile, and personal), any instance of third-party data hosting (emails, social media, sales platforms, etc.), and internal and external storage locations. This visual depiction can be beneficial during a self-collection because it provides a "treasure map" to the data that can be easily understood and actioned.
Any reasonable attorney must take into account the human factor and safeguard against risks, including the intentional deletion of data and the sluggishness of their client's employees.

Federal Rule of Evidence 902: What's the attorney's role in the process?
While we won't cover the legal hold process in this whitepaper, it involves many of the same issues as a collection, including the identification and supervision that the collection process presents. In short, it is impossible to collect what has not been preserved, and it is equally impossible to preserve what has not been identified. With so much at stake, responsibility for preservation and adequate collection practices falls on the attorney. Because of this added responsibility, involvement in the process throughout the life cycle of litigation is crucial to protecting the client's best interests.
Early in the identification process, a litigation attorney must be vigilant about what custodial data is involved and where that data is stored. First, the scope of the litigation determines the breadth and depth of the attorney's responsibility to safeguard any data that may fall within that scope. This practice is not limited to data they know to be part of a current litigation, but extends to data that may be part of future litigations. In effect, the FRCP and the Federal Rules of Evidence make an attorney the fiduciary of litigation data for current or potential future litigations.
How does this relate to self-collections? Even attorneys involved in the litigation do not always know what data or evidence may be relevant, so it is reckless to believe that employees possessing ESI will be able to make this judgment. The best course of action is to meet with opposing counsel and design a legal hold that will reasonably capture as much relevant ESI as possible. This may include scheduled meetings with identified or potential custodians to ensure compliance with legal holds.
It is important to point out that the ABA has expressly recommended that attorneys understand their client's use of technology (Rule 1.1 comment 8). Additionally, most US states have made technology competency a part of their Model Rules of Professional Conduct. However, some of the language used by the states is quite vague and speaks to a standard of care akin to avoiding negligence.
One final area that should be addressed is the "chain of custody." An attorney should maintain a proper, well-documented ESI chain of custody, which starts with the identification and collection of the litigation data and continues throughout the litigation's life. Any alteration to collected data is traced back to the party in control of it at the time of the alteration. Comparing the hash values is a quick and easy way to identify if a document was altered, but this also presumes that metadata has been preserved and collected. Treat ESI like you would any other piece of trial evidence. It is essential to know and understand the life cycle of the trial evidence to maintain accurate records of your efforts.
Conclusion to the Attorney's Guide to Federal Rule of Evidence 902 – Avoiding Self-Collection Minefields
Investing money upfront to hire a professional or train internal employees to perform forensically sound collections can stave off future pitfalls associated with using and reviewing litigation data. Keeping in mind that the most expensive aspect of an eDiscovery project is the time that attorneys or paralegals spend reviewing the ESI that was collected, it becomes even more apparent that investing in proper collection practices is cost-justified. Familiarize your team with Federal Rule of Evidence 902 to ensure you follow the amended rule and provide the best advice to your client to protect everyone's best interests! In the digital data era, the Federal Rules of Evidence Rules will continue to evolve to match the current needs.
There are many moving parts to eDiscovery: Human, technical, legal, and ethical. By ensuring that companies follow the proper legal holds and collection practices, an attorney may perfectly position themselves to safeguard their client from possible sanctions for spoliation and reduce the resources spent by litigation support and review professionals. Whatever the amount of money that might be saved by following a DIY model of self-collection, this will certainly be outweighed by extra resources spent by litigation support professionals, reviewing attorneys, and the need to hire trial experts to authenticate the data collected.
The best defense is staying up-to-date on trends and requirements for ESI in litigation. This whitepaper covering Federal Rule of Evidence 902 is one part of that information-sharing initiative Questel is driving for the Legal market. When exploring if you should engage in ESI self-collection, consider the old English sailing proverb, "A stitch in time saves nine," which loosely means that a timely effort today can prevent more work later, is still applicable to modern-day litigation practices.
For specific advice or more insight on the information shared in this blog, get in touch with our experts.
Adam Bowers is a former employee of doeLEGAL, A Questel Company. Adam is an eDiscovery expert, LLM candidate, a former business owner, and legal technology practitioner who helps law firms and attorneys navigate the complex world of eDiscovery.